Why should a Philosopher of Science care about Simulations?

Eva Žáčková

Abstract


Why should a philosopher of science be interested in simulations at all? The author of the paper points out current ubiquity of computer simulation methods in science, and more importantly, their great potential for development of truly new methodological concepts and categories in theory and philosophy of science. The described example of a numerical experiment, which is one of the most used and useful forms of simulation in science, epitomizes their ambiguous methodological status. On one hand, one can clearly identify features of simulations that are obviously related to theoretical approaches in science. On the other hand, simulations often play a role similar to empirical evidence, which leads us to a conclusion that simulations might be more on the experimental side. In this paper I focus mainly on Humphreys` interpretation of simulation as a hybrid category that could arouse a call for new foundation of theory of science.

Keywords


methodology of science, computational empiricism, computer simulation, numerical experiment

https://doi.org/10.5817/pf14-1-507

Full Text:

PDF (Czech)

References

Show references Hide references

Baudrillard, J. (1981) Simulacres et simulation. Paris: Galilée.

Eco, U. (1998) Faith in Fakes. Travels in Hyperreality. London: Vintage.

Frigg, R. – Reiss, J. (2009) The Philosophy of Simulation. Hot New Issues or The Same Old Stew? Synthese, 169 (3), s. 593-613.

Hartmann, S. (2005) The World as a Process. Simulations in the Natural and Social Sciences. PhilSci-Archive [online].[cit. 2013-03-13] Dostupné z WWW: < http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/2412 >

Humphreys, P. (1995) Computational Empiricism. Foundation of Science, 1 (1), s. 119-130.

Humphreys, P. (2004) Extending Ourselves. Computational Science, Empiricism, and Scientific Method. Oxford: OUP.

Humphreys, P. (2009) Philosophical Novelty of Computer Simulation Methods. Synthese, 169 (3), s. 615-626.

Lenhard, J. (2010) Computation and Simulation. In: Frodeman, R. et al. (eds.): The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity. Oxford University Press, 246-258.

Rohrlich, F. (1991) Computer Simulation in the Physical Sciences. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, Volume 2, s. 507-518.

Turkle, S. (2009) Simulation and Its Discontents. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

Williams, L. – Thomas, W. (2009) The Epistemologies of Non-Forecasting Simulations. Science in Context, 22(2), s. 271-310.





Published by the Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Arts, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
ISSN: 1212-9097