Where Teachers Learn Through Work and Students Work to Learn: An Empirically Informed Report on Two Examples of Educational Innovations From a German School

Malte Gregorzewski

Abstrakt


This empirically informed report presents two innovative approaches to learning through work and working to learn from a secondary school in Germany, with both the school and its innovative development having received the German School Award. In one approach, the school's leadership team deployed the new "Challenges" school project for students' comprehensive educational development. In the other, the school initiated the possibility for teachers to gain practical experience outside the school by working full-time. In addition to their teaching duties, teachers can now work for a limited period in the private sector, thereby gaining valuable experience by shaping their professional stances and influencing their approaches to their students in everyday school life. This empirically informed report is based on desk research complemented by qualitative data gathered during a site visit. These data shall give a deeper understanding of how innovative actions initiated by the school leadership team can contribute to change within an educational system towards advanced teacher learning and transformative school development to achieve better student success.

Klíčová slova


teacher learning; student learning; school leadership; educational innovations; German School Award

https://doi.org/10.5817/SP2018-2-8

Celý článek:

PDF

Reference

Zobrazit literaturu Skrýt literaturu

Anonymous. (2017). School program. Unpublished manuscript (as of August 2017).

Abusabha, R., & Woelfel, M. (2003). Qualitative vs. quantitative methods: Two opposites that make a perfect match. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 103(5), 566–575. | DOI 10.1053/jada.2003.50129

Amaro, G. (2000). Curriculum innovation in Portugal: The Área Escola – an arena for cross-curricular activities and curriculum development. Geneva: International Bureau of Education, UNESCO.

Ammann, M. (2009). Stakeholderpartizipation in der Schule. Ein Beitrag zu einer Organisationstheorie der Schule aus mikropolitischer Perspektive. München: Rainer Hampp Verlag.

Arnz, S. (2010). Bessere Chancen für alle durch die neue Schulstruktur. Betrifft: Lehrerbildung und Schule, 6, 5–11.

Attenslander, P. (2010). Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung. Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag.

Bakkenes, I., Vermunt, J. D., & Wubbels, T. (2010). Teacher learning in the context of educational innovation: Learning activities and learning outcomes of experienced teachers. Learning and Instruction, 20(6), 533–548. | DOI 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.09.001

Ball, S., Maguire, M., & Braun, A. (2012). How schools do policy: Policy enactment in secondary schools. London: Routeledge.

Bartels, J., & Nix, T. (Eds.). (2010). Duales Lernen. Handreichung für die Praxis. Berlin: Senator für Bildung, Wissenschaft und Forschung.

Baumert, J., Artelt, C., Klieme, E., Neubrand, J., Prenzel, M., Schiefele, U., Schneider, W., Tillmann, K.-J., & Weiß, M. (Eds.). (2002). PISA 2000. Die Länder der Bundesrepublik Deutschland im Vergleich. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.

Bayer, M. (2012). Innovationsbedarf und Leitlinien für die Facharbeit in globalen Dienstleistungsbranchen. In A. Boes, A. Baukrowith, T. Kämpf & K. Marrs (Eds.), Qualifizierung für eine global vernetzte Ökonomie (pp. 195–202), Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler.

Beijaard, D., Korthagen, F. A. J., & Verloop, N. (2007). Understanding how teachers learn as a prerequisite for promoting teacher learning. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 13(2), 105–108.

Benke, M. (2015). New and old partnerships targeting VET in the 21st century. In M. Gessler & L. Freund (Eds.), Crossing boundaries in vocational education and training: Innovative concepts for the 21st century conference proceedings. Evaluate Europe handbook series. Bremen: University of Bremen, Institute Technology and Education.

Benke, M. (2015). The spatial frame of lifelong learning: Learning regions, learning cities, learning communities. Hungarian Educational Research Journal, 5(4), 79–86.

Bredeson, P. (2000). The school principal's role in teacher professional development. Journal of In-Service Education, 26(2), 385-401. | DOI 10.1080/13674580000200114

Beutel, S.-I., Höhmann, K., Schratz, M., & Pant, H. (2016). Handbuch gute Schule. Seelze: Klett Kallmeyer.

Biesta, G. (2012). The future of teacher education: Evidence, competence or wisdom? RoSE – Research on Steiner Education, 3(1), 8–21. Retrieved from http://www.rosejourn.com/index.php/rose/article/view/92

Chaffee, E. E., & Tierney, W. G. (1988). Collegiate culture and leadership strategies. New York: Macmillan.

Day, C., Sammons, P., Hopkins, D., Harris, A., Leithwood, K., Gu, Q., Brown, E., Ahtaridou, E., & Kington, A. (2009). The impact of school leadership on pupil outcomes – Final report. Retrieved from http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/11329/1/DCSF-RR108.pdf

Darling-Hammond, L. (1998). Teacher learning that supports student learning. Educational Leadership, 55(5), 6–11.

Daughtery, C. (2009). An exercise in rigor: A review of Robert K. Yin's case study research design and method. The Weekly Qualitative Report, 2(27), 162–165.

Deans, T. (1999). Service-Learning in two keys: Paulo Freire's critical pedagogy in relation to John Dewey's pragmatism. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 6(1), 15–29.

Dewey, J. (1904). The relation of theory to practice in education. In C. A. McMurry (Ed.), The third yearbook of the National society for the scientific study of education. Part I. (pp. 9–30). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Dewey, J. (1961). Philosophy of education: Problems of men. New Jersey: Littlefield, Adams & Co.

Duze, C. (2012). The changing role of school leadership and teacher capacity building in teaching and learning. Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational Research and Policy Studies, 3(1), 111–117.

Eckhartdt, T. (Ed.). (2017). The education system in the Federal Republic of Germany 2014/2015. Bonn: Secretariat of the Standing Conference of the Ministers of Education and Cultural Affairs of the Länder in the Federal Republic of Germany. Retrieved from https://www.kmk.org/fileadmin/Dateien/pdf/Eurydice/Bildungswesen-engl-pdfs/dossier_en_ebook.pdf

Ellis, D., Bissonnette, C., Furion, S., Hall, S., Kenyon, T., McCarville, R., Stubley, G., & Woudsma, C. (2011). The task force on innovative teaching practices to promote deep learning at the University of Waterloo: Final report. Retrieved from https://uwaterloo.ca/centre-for-teachingexcellence/sites/ca.centre-for-teaching-excellence/files/uploads/files/Task%20Force%20Report%20on%20Deep%20Learning_0.pdf

Erk, J. (2003). Federal Germany and its non-federal society: Emergence of an all-German educational policy in a system of exclusive provincial jurisdiction. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 36(2), 295–317.

Ertl, H. (2004). Tradition and reform: modernising the German dual system of vocational education. In G. Hayward & S. James (Eds.), Balancing the skills question – Key issues and challenges for policy and practice. Bristol: The Policy Press.

Federal Ministry of Education and Research. (2015). Report on vocational education and training 2015. Bonn: Federal Ministry of Education and Research.

Franz, W., & Soskice, D. W. (1994). The German apprenticeship system. Discussion paper. Paper presented at the 2nd Workshop on institutional frameworks and labour market performance, Center for international labour economics (CILE), University of Konstanz, November 18–20, 1993, Nürnberg. Retrieved from https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/92436/1/720918545.pdf

Flick, U. (2005). Triangulation in der qualitativen Forschung. In U. Flick, E. von Kardorff & I. Steinke (Eds.). Qualitative Forschung. Ein Handbuch (pp. 309–318). Hamburg: Rowohlt.

Fullan, M., & Langworthy, M. (2014). A rich seam – How new pedagogies find deep learning. London: Pearson. Retrieved from: http://www.michaelfullan.ca/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/3897.Rich_Seam_web.pdf

Fuchs, C. (2005). Selbstwirksam Lernen im schulischen Kontext: Kennzeichen – Bedingungen – Umsetzungsbeispiele. Bad Heilbrunn: Klinkhardt.

von Glasersfeld, E. (2005). Konstruktion der Wirklichkeit und des Begriffs der Objektivität. In H. Gumin, & H. Meier (Eds.). Einführung in den Konstruktivismus (pp. 9–39). München: Piper Verlag.

Gessler, M., & Freund, L. (2015). Introduction. In M. Gessler & L. Freund (Eds.). Crossing boundaries in vocational Education and training: Innovative concepts for the 21st century. Bremen: Institute Technology and Education, University of Bremen.

Gregorzewski, M., & Kovacs, H. (2017). A mix that works for school development: School leadership and knowledge sharing. In L. Rasiński, T. Toth & J. Wagner (Eds.), European perspectives in transformative education (pp. 204–221). Wroclaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Dolnośląskiej Szkoły Wyższej we Wrocławiu.

Gruber, K.-H. (2006). The German 'PISA-shock': some aspects of the extraordinary impact of the OECD's PISA study on the German education system. In H. Ertl (Ed.), Cross-national attraction in Education accounts from England and Germany. Oxford: Symposium Books.

Halász, G. (2011). School Leadership and Pupil Learning Outcomes. In T. Barath & M. Szabó (Eds.), Does Leadership Matter? Implications for Leadership Development and the School as a Learning Organisation, (pp. 19–31). Szeged: HUNSEM.

Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers. London: Routledge.

Helfferich, C. (2005). Die Qualität qualitativer Daten. Manual für die Durchführung qualitativer Interviews. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

Hentig, H. v. (1993). Die Schule neu denken. Eine Übung in praktischer Vernunft. Eine zornige, aber nicht eifernde, eine radikale, aber nicht utopische Antwort auf Hoyerswerda und Mölln, Rostock & Solingen. München: Hanser.

Jacoby, B. (2009). Facing the unsettled questions about service-leaning. In J. Strait & M. Lima, (Eds.), The future of service-learning, (pp. 90–105). Sterling: Stylus Publishing.

Jarvis, P., Holford, J., & Griffin, C. (2003). The theory and practice of learning. London: Routledge.

Kovacs, H. (2017): Learning and teaching in innovation: why it is important for education in 21st century, Neveléstudomány, 5, 45–60. | DOI 10.21549/NTNY.18.2017.2.4

Kovacs, H., & Gregorzewski, M. (2017). A mix that works for school development: Teacher learning and school leadership. In L. Rasiński, T. Toth & J. Wagner (Eds.), European perspectives in transformative education (pp. 184–203). Wroclaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Dolnośląskiej Szkoły Wyższej we Wrocławiu.

Kovacs, H., & Tinoca, L. (2017). Unfreeze the pedagogies: introduction of a new innovative measure in Portugal. Revista Tempos e Espaços em Educação, 10(23), 73–86.

Kozma, R. B. (1985). A grounded theory of instructional innovation in higher education. The Journal of Higher Education, 56(3), 300–319. | DOI 10.2307/1981736

Kraft, R. J. (1996). Service learning: An introduction to its theory, practice, and effects. Education and Urban Society, 28(2), 131–159. | DOI 10.1177/0013124596028002001

Kwo, O. (2010). Teachers as learners: Critical discourse on challenges and opportunities. Dortrecht: Springer.

Lamnek, S. (2005). Qualitative Sozialforschung. Lehrbuch. Weinheim: Beltz.

Lewis, T. (2007). The problem of cultural fit – what can we learn from borrowing the German dual system? Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 37(4), 463–477. | DOI 10.1080/03057920701366408

Lundvall, B.-A. (Ed.) (1992). National innovation systems: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter Publishers.

Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

O'Sullivan, D. (2008). Defining innovation. In D. O'Sullivan & L. Dooley (Eds.), Applying innovation (pp. 3–32). Thousand Oaks: Sage. Retrieved from https://www.sagepub.com/sites/default/files/upm-binaries/23137_Chapter_1.pdf

Picht, G. (1964). Die Deutsche Bildungskatastrophe: Analyse und Dokumentation. Freiburg im Breisgau: Olten.

Pritchard, R. (1999). Reconstructing education: East German schools and universities after unification. New York: Berghahn.

Ratzki, A. (2011). Primetime: Aufbruch in die Zukunft. In M. Prenzel, M. Schratz & G. Schultebraucks-Burgkart (Eds.), Was für Schulen (pp. 62–70). Seelze: Klett Kallmeyer.

Rauner, F., & Smith, E. (2010). Introduction: Rediscovering Apprenticeship. In E. Smith & F. Rauner (Eds.), Technical and vocational education and training: Issues, concerns and prospects, volume 11. Dordrecht: Springer.

Robert Bosch Stiftung. (2018). The German school award. Retrieved from http://www.boschstiftung.de/en/project/german-school-award

Roldão, M. C. (2003). Strategies to promote good practice and innovation in schools – The Portuguese case. In Networks of innovation: Towards new models for managing schools and systems (pp. 87–97). Paris: OECD Publishing.

Scharmer, C. (2009). Theory U: Learning from the future as it emerges. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.

Schley, W. (2003). Nachhaltigkeit und Wirksamkeit der Schulentwicklung. Eine Glosse zum Alzheimersyndrom der Schulentwicklung. Journal für Schulentwicklung, 2, 7–10.

Schratz, M., & Steiner-Löffler, U. (1998). Die Lernende Schule – Arbeitsbuch pädagogische Schulentwicklung. Weinheim: Beltz.

Schunk, D. (1991). Self-efficacy and academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26(3–4), 207–231. | DOI 10.1080/00461520.1991.9653133

Senatsverwaltung für Bildung, Wissenschaft und Forschung des Landes Berlin. (2009). Die Berliner Schulstrukturreform. Retrived from http://www.dahmeschule.de/images/pdfs/pdf_schulstruktur.pdf

Senge, P. (2006). The fifth discipline. The art and practice of the learning organization. New York & London: Currency Doubleday.

Shirley, D. (2016). Das Gebot für eine Neugestaltung von Bildung. In S.-I. Beutel, K. Höhmann, M. Schratz & H. Pant, Handbuch Gute Schule (pp. 8–11). Seelze: Klett Kallmeyer.

Stake, R. (2005): Qualitative case studies. In N. Denzin (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (pp. 443–466). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Stanat, P., & Baumert, J. (2002). PISA-Studie – Deutschland nur im Mittelfeld. Basiskompetenzen von Schülerinnen und Schülern im internationalen Vergleich. Wirtschaft & Wissenschaft, 10(2), 42–51.

Stein, M., & Wang, M. (1988). Teacher development and school improvement: The process of teacher change, Teaching and Teacher Education, 4(2), 171–187. | DOI 10.1016/0742-051X(88)90016-9

Teherani, A., Martimianakis, T., Stenfors-Hayes, T., Wadhwa, A., & Varpio, L. (2015). Choosing a qualitative research approach. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 7(4), 669–670. | DOI 10.4300/JGME-D-15-00414.1

Voogt, J. (2012). ICTs for curriculum change. Moscow: UNESCO Institute for Information Technologies. Retrieved from https://iite.unesco.org/pics/publications/en/files/3214717.pdf

Walsh, K. (2003). Qualitative research: Advancing the science and practice of hospitality. Cornell Hotel & Restaurant Quarterly, 44(12), 66–75.

Yin, R. K. (1984). Case study research: Design and methods. Beverly Hills: Sage.

Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Yoon, K. S., Duncan, T., Lee, S., Scarloss, B., & Shapley, K. (2007). Reviewing the evidence on how teacher professional development affects student achievement (Issues & Answers Report, REL 2007-No. 033.) Washington, D.C.: Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Reagonal Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Southwest.




 


Časopis Ústavu pedagogických věd FF MU.

Výkonná redakce: Klára Šeďová, Roman Švaříček, Zuzana Šalamounová, Martin Sedláček, Karla Brücknerová, Petr Hlaďo.

Redakční rada: Milan Pol (předseda redakční rady), Gunnar Berg, Michael Bottery, Hana Cervinkova, Theo van Dellen, Eve Eisenschmidt, Peter Gavora, Yin Cheong Cheng, Miloš Kučera, Adam Lefstein, Sami Lehesvuori, Jan Mareš, Jiří Mareš, Jiří Němec, Angelika Paseka, Jana Poláchová Vašťatková, Milada Rabušicová, Alina Reznitskaya, Michael Schratz, Martin Strouhal, Petr Svojanovský, António Teodoro, Tony Townsend, Anita Trnavčevič, Jan Vanhoof, Arnošt Veselý, Kateřina Vlčková, Eliška Walterová.

Časopis vydává čtyři čísla ročně.

ISSN 1803-7437 (print), ISSN 2336-4521 (online)