Problém statusu přírodních zákonů v Popperově rané teorii poznání

Jitka Paitlová


This paper focuses on the problem of status of natural laws and is based upon the analysis of Popper’s early work Die beiden Grundprobleme der Erkenntnislehre that had been written before his Logic of Scientific Discovery but was published almost fifty years later. Popper and logical positivists agree that from logical point of view it is possible to decide about the truth of singular reality statements but never of those general. Therefore, the positivists refuse to acknowledge natural laws as general statements and they call them just as summary reports which can be definitively verified or falsified. On the contrary Popper asserts that natural laws are general statements which are definitively (logical) falsifiable, while in a positive way they can be only temporary (pragmatic) corroborate. Popper is inspired by so called consequent pragmatism and he calls his own solution of the problem of the status of natural laws as the asymmetry of values.


Popper; Grundprobleme; theory of knowledge; natural laws; Schlick; positivism

Full Text:

PDF (Czech)


Show references Hide references

Adorno, T. W. et al. (1972): Der Positivismusstreit in der deutschen Soziologie, Luchterhand.

Gattei, S. (2004): Karl Popper’s Philosophical Breakthrough, Philosophy of Science 71 (4), 448–466.

Hacohen, M. H. (1998): Karl Popper, the Vienna Circle and Red Vienna, Journal of the History of Ideas 59 (4), 711–734.

Lansana, K. (1989): Are Universal Statements Falsifiable? A Critique of Popper’s Falsifiability Criterion, Zeitschrift für allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie / Journal for General Philoosphy of Science 20 (2), 351–366.

Lewis, J. (1988): Schlick’s Critique of Positivism, Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Sience Association 1, 110–117.

Morgenstern, M. (2015): Popper und das Problem der Metaphysik, Aufklärung und Kritik 22 (4), 78–101.

Naraniecki, A. (2014): Returning to Karl Popper: A reassessment of his politics and philosophy, Rodopi.

Parusniková, Z. (2003): Vyřešil K. R. Popper psychologický problém indukce, in Havlík, V. (ed.) Metoda – význam – intence. Popperovské motivy v současném analytickém myšlení, FILOSOFIA, 55–65.

Popper, K. R. (1997): Logika vědeckého zkoumání, OIKOYMENH.

Popper, K. R. (1995): Věčné hledání. Intelektuální autobiografie, Prostor.

Popper, K. R. (1994): Die beiden Grundprobleme der Erkenntnistheorie: Aufgrund von Manuskripten aus den Jahren 1930–1933, zweite, verbesserte Auflage, Mohr Siebeck.

Rutte, H. (1976): Moritz Schlick, der Positivismus und der Neopositivismus, Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 30 (2), 246–268.

Seubert, H. (2016): Karl Popper wiedergelesen – was bleibt, Aufklärung und Kritik 23 (1), 7–23.

Schlick, M. (2008): Die Kausalität in der gegenwärtigen Physik, in Schlick, M. (ed.) Die Wiener Zeit. Aufsätze, Beiträge, Rezensionen 1926–1936. Moritz Schlick Gesamtausgabe. Band I/6, Springer, 231–292.

Stadler, S. (2015): Der Wiener Kreis. Ursprung, Entwicklung und Wirkung des Logischen Empirismus im Kontext, Springer.

Copyright (c) 2017 Pro-Fil

Published by the Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Arts, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
ISSN: 1212-9097