Bridging the Gap Between Theory and Practice with Design-Based Action Research

Subin Nijhawan


This article proposes design-based action research as an addendum to large-scale educational research. Placing design-based research together with teachers' action research into one single method, this study takes a pragmatic approach in accordance with Dewey's (1938) philosophy on democratic change in education. Its participatory methodological framework includes stakeholders directly into the discourse about educational improvements and reforms. To make my claims substantial, I will elucidate why teachers' practical knowledge is of paramount importance for bridging the well-known gap between theory and practice. I will exemplify the constructed method with a research project exploring the potential of The Simpsons for bilingual Politics & Economics classes. I will argue that the overall approach I offer makes practical knowledge become scientific. Additionally, considerations for including design-based action research as a methodological pathway into teacher education are mentioned.

Klíčová slova

design-based research; action research; mētis; pragmatism; teacher education; educational reforms

Celý článek:

PDF (English)


Zobrazit literaturu Skrýt literaturu

Adelman, C. (1993). Kurt Lewin and the origins of action research. Educational Action Research, 1(1), 7–24. | DOI 10.1080/0965079930010102

Anderson, T., & Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-based research: A decade of progress in education research? Educational Researcher, 41(1), 16–25. | DOI 10.3102/0013189X11428813

Argyris, C., Putnam, R., & McLain Smith, D. (1985). Action science. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Barab, S., & Squire, K. (2004). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 1–14. | DOI 10.1207/s15327809jls1301_1

Baumfield, V., Hall, E., & Wall, K. (2012). Action research in education: Learning through practitioner enquiry: SAGE Publications.

Brown, A. L. (1992). Design Experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141–178. | DOI 10.1207/s15327809jls0202_2

Cantor, P. A. (1999). The Simpsons: Atomistic politics and the nuclear family. Political Theory, 27(6), 734–749. | DOI 10.1177/0090591799027006002

Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9–13. | DOI 10.3102/0013189X032001009

Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1999). Relationships of knowledge and practice: Teacher learning in communities. Review of Research in Education, 24, 249–305.

Cole, R., Purao, S., Rossi, M., & Sein, M. K. (2005). Being proactive: Where action research meets design research. In D. Avison, D. Galletta, & J. I. DeGross (Eds.), ICIS International Conference on Information Systems, Las Vegas, USA, December 11–14, 2005 (pp. 325–335): Association for Information Systems (AIS).

Collins, A. (1992). Toward a design science of education. In E. Scanlon & T. O'Shea (Eds.), New Directions in Educational Technology (15–22). Berlin: Springer.

DESI-Konsortium (eds.). (2006). Unterricht und Kompetenzerwerb in Deutsch und Englisch. Zentrale Befunde der Studie Deutsch-Englisch-Schülerleistungen-International (DESI). Frankfurt am Main: Deutsches Institut für Internationale Pädagogische Forschung. Retrieved from

Detienne, M., & Vernant, J. P. (1978). Cunning Intelligence in Greek Culture and Society. Trans. Janet Lloyd, Hassocks: Harvester Press.

Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and Education. New York: The Macmillan company.

Feyerabend, P. (1993). Against Method. London: Verso.

Fichten, W. (2005). Selbstbeobachtung von Forschung – Reflexions- und Erkenntnispotenziale der Oldenburger Teamforschung. In E. Eckert & W. Fichten (Eds.), Schulbegleitforschung (pp. 105–126). Münster: Waxmann.

Fischer, F., Waibel, M., & Wecker, C. (2005). Nutzenorientierte Grundlagenforschung im Bildungsbereich. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 8(3), 427–442. | DOI 10.1007/s11618-005-0149-7

Geertz, C. (2000). Local knowledge: Further essays in interpretive anthropology. New York: Basic Books.

Genesee, F. (1987). Learning through two languages: Studies of immersion and bilingual education. Cambridge: Newbury House.

Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96(3), 606–633. | DOI 10.1525/aa.1994.96.3.02a00100

Grek, S. (2009). Governing by numbers: The PISA 'effect' in Europe. Journal of Education Policy, 24(1), 23–37. | DOI 10.1080/02680930802412669

Hall, J. (2005). Homer economicus: Using The Simpsons to teach economics. Journal of Private Enterprise, 30(2), 165–176.

Kristiansen, A. (2001). Animation and teaching: Enhancing subjects from the curriculum by using "The Simpsons" in high school English teaching. Retrieved from

Letiche, H., & Statler, M. (2005). Evoking Metis: Questioning the logics of change, responsiveness, meaning and action in organizations. Culture and Organization, 11(1), 1–16. | DOI 10.1080/14759550500062219

Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2(4), 34–46. | DOI 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1946.tb02295.x

Mackay, D., Zundel, M., & Alkirwi, M. (2014). Exploring the practical wisdom of Mētis for management learning. Management Learning, 45(4), 418–436. | DOI 10.1177/1350507614541197

Meyer, H. D., & Zahedi, K. (2014). Open letter to Andreas Schleicher, OECD, Paris. Policy Futures in Education, 12(7), 872–877.

Nijhawan, S. (2013). A visit by five yellow people from Springfield, USA, to a German 9th grade: What can The Simpsons contribute to bilingual teaching in politics & economics? Studienseminar für Gymnasien. Frankfurt am Main.

Nijhawan, S. (2014). Vom Comic zum Zeichentrickfilm – Sachfachunterricht mit "The Simpsons". Praxis Fremdsprachenunterricht (Englisch), 11(3), 13–15.

Pålshaugen, Ø. (2009). How to generate knowledge from single case research on innovation? International Journal of Action Research, 5(3), 231–254.

Richards, K. (2003). Qualitative inquiry in TESOL. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Sahlberg, P. (2006). Education reform for raising economic competitiveness. Journal of Educational Change, 7(4), 259–287. | DOI 10.1007/s10833-005-4884-6

Sahlberg, P. (2011). The Fourth Way of Finland. Journal of Educational Change, 12(2), 173–185. | DOI 10.1007/s10833-011-9157-y

Scanlan, S. J., & Feinberg, S. L. (2000). The cartoon society: Using "The Simpsons" to teach and learn sociology. Teaching Sociology, 28(2), 127–139. | DOI 10.2307/1319260

Schaenen, I., Kohnen, A., Flinn, P., Saul, W., & Zeni, J. (2012). 'I' is for 'insider': Practitioner research in schools. International Journal of Action Research, 8(1), 68–101.

Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.

Scott, J. C. (1998). Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Sein, M. K., Henfridsson, O., Purao, S., Rossi, M., & Lindgren, R. (2011). Action design. MIS Quarterly, 35(1), 37–56. | DOI 10.2307/23043488

Sellar, S., & Lingard, B. (2013). The OECD and global governance in education. Journal of Education Policy, 28(5), 710–725. | DOI 10.1080/02680939.2013.779791

Stark, J. L. (2014). The potential of Deweyan-inspired action research. Education and Culture, 30(2), 87–101. | DOI 10.1353/eac.2014.0013

Swaffar, J., & Vlatten, A. (1997). A sequential model for video viewing in the foreign language curriculum. The Modern Language Journal, 81(2), 175–188. | DOI 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1997.tb01173.x

The Design-Based Research Collective. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5–8.

Thiollent, M. (2011). Action research and participatory research: An overview. International Journal of Action Research, 7(2), 160–174.

Timperley, H., Wilson, A., Barrar, H., & Fung, I. (2007). Teacher professional learning and development: Best evidence synthesis iteration. Wellington: Ministry of Education.

Weber, M. (1919). Wissenschaft als Beruf. München: Duncker & Humblot.


Časopis Ústavu pedagogických věd FF MU.

Výkonná redakce: Klára Šeďová, Roman Švaříček, Zuzana Šalamounová, Martin Sedláček, Karla Brücknerová, Petr Hlaďo.

Redakční rada: Milan Pol (předseda redakční rady), Gunnar Berg, Inka Bormann, Michael Bottery, Elisa Calcagni, Hana Cervinkova, Eve Eisenschmidt, Ola Andres Erstad, Peter Gavora, Yin Cheong Cheng, Miloš Kučera, Adam Lefstein, Sami Lehesvuori, Jan Mareš, Jiří Mareš, Jiří Němec, Angelika Paseka, Jana Poláchová Vašťatková, Milada Rabušicová, Alina Reznitskaya, Michael Schratz, Martin Strouhal, Petr Svojanovský, António Teodoro, Tony Townsend, Anita Trnavčevič, Jan Vanhoof, Arnošt Veselý, Kateřina Vlčková, Eliška Walterová.

Časopis vydává čtyři čísla ročně.

ISSN 1803-7437 (print), ISSN 2336-4521 (online)