Benefits of a Small Research Study for the Teacher Education at a University of Applied Sciences: A Case Study

Lieveke Hellemans, Stefan Haesen

Abstrakt


At a university of applied sciences, the obstacles to doing research are time, support, and the lack of a research tradition. It is therefore important to obtain as much as possible from the research studies that can be implemented. This article describes the benefits that could be obtained from a small study called Inclu-S-ed. In this study, the effect of an inquiry-based learning (IBL) science course on the knowledge and motivation of 11–12-year-old pupils in a culturally diverse primary classroom was investigated. Although the results of this study were rather limited, several benefits for teacher education could be obtained at various levels: (1) the IBL science course developed in the study is now used as a professional development course for in- -service primary teachers and is embedded into the curriculum of pre-service primary teacher education, (2) Inclu-S-ed was the basis for two new research studies, and (3) participating in Inclu-S-ed represented professional development for the lecturers involved.

Klíčová slova


research-teaching nexus; science education; teacher education

https://doi.org/10.5817/SP2017-4-6

Celý článek:

PDF (English)

Reference

Zobrazit literaturu Skrýt literaturu

Abrahams, I. (2008). Does practical work really motivate? A study of the affective value of practical work in secondary school science. International Journal of Science Education, 31(17), 2335–2353. | DOI 10.1080/09500690802342836

Biesta, G. (2010). Why 'What works' still won't work: From evidence-based education to value-based education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 29(5), 491–503. | DOI 10.1007/s11217-010-9191-x

Castelijns, J., & Vermeulen M. (2017). Benutting van kennis uit onderzoek. Tijdschrift voor lerarenopleiders, 38(2), 19–30.

Chatterton, P. (2000). The cultural role of universities in the community: Revisiting the university-Community debate. Environment and Planning A, 32(1), 165–181. | DOI 10.1068/a3243

Crevits, H. (2016). Lerarenopleiding versterken. Wervende en kwalitatieve lerarenopleidingen als basispijler voor hoogstaand onderwijs. Retrieved from http://www.coc.be/files/newsitems/.824/20160325%20conceptonta%20Lerarenopleiding.pdf

Cuevas, P., Lee, O., Hart, J., & Deaktor, R. (2005). Improving science inquiry with elementary students of diverse backgrounds. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(3), 337–357. | DOI 10.1002/tea.20053

Dejonckheere, P., Van de Keere, K., & Tallir, I. (2011). Are fourth and fifth grade children better scientists through metacognitive learning? Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 9(1), 133–156.

Dejonckheere, P., Van de Keere, K., Tallir, I., & Vervaet, S. (2013). Primary school science: Implementation of domain-general strategies into teaching didactics. The Australian Educational Researcher, 40(5), 583–614. | DOI 10.1007/s13384-013-0119-7

Depaepe, F., De Corte, E., & Verschaffel, L. (2010). Teachers' approaches towards word problem solving: elaborating or restricting the problem context. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(2), 152–160. | DOI 10.1016/j.tate.2009.03.016

De Smet, J., & Hellemans, L. (in preparation). The motivation of pupils in STEM course in secondary schools.

De Vaan, E., & Marell, J. (2006) Praktische didactiek voor natuuronderwijs. The Netherlands: Uitgeverij Coutinho.

European Commission/EACEA/Eurydice. (2015). The European higher education area in 2015: Bologna process implementation report. Luxembourg: Publication Office of the European Union.

Galbraith, C., & Merrill, G. (2012). Faculty research productivity and standardized student learning outcomes in a university teaching environment: A Bayesian analysis of relationships. Studies in Higher Education, 37(4), 469–480. | DOI 10.1080/03075079.2010.523782

Guenther, J., & Wagner, K. (2008). Getting out of the ivory tower – new perspectives of the entrepreneurial university. Journal of International Management, 2(4), 400–417.

Hattie, J., & Marsh, H. (1996). The relationship between research and teaching: A metaanalysis. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 507–542. | DOI 10.3102/00346543066004507

Healey, M. (2005). Linking research and teaching to benefit student learning. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 29(2), 183–201. | DOI 10.1080/03098260500130387

Hmelo-Silver, C. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3) 235–266. | DOI 10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3

Kyvik, S., & Lepori, B. (2010). Research in higher education institutions outside the university sector. In S. Keyvik & B. Lepori (Eds.), The research mission of higher education institutions outside the university sector (pp. 3-21). Dodrecht: Springer.

Laevers, F. (Red.) (1994). The Leuven involvement scale for young children. Manual and video. Experiential Education Series, No 1. Leuven: Centre for Experiential Education.

Lavigne, G., Vallerand, R., & Miquelon P. (2007). A motivational model of persistence in science education. European Journal of Psycholog y of Education, 22(3), 351–369. | DOI 10.1007/BF03173432

Lopes, A., Boyd, P. Andrew, N., & Pereira, F. (2014). The research-teaching nexus in nurse and teacher education: Contributions of an ecological approach to academic identities in professional fields. Higher Education, 68(2), 167–183. | DOI 10.1007/s10734-013-9700-2

Loughran, J. (2002). Effective reflective practice: In search of meaning in learning about teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(1), 33–43. | DOI 10.1177/0022487102053001004

Lyle, S. (1996). An analysis of collaborative group work in the primary school and the factors relevant for its success. Language and Education, 10(1), 13–32. | DOI 10.1080/09500789608666698

Malcolm, M. (2014). A critical evaluation of recent progress in understanding the role of the research-teaching link in higher education. Higher Education, 67(3), 289–301. | DOI 10.1007/s10734-013-9650-8

Marsh, H., & Hattie, J. (2002). The relation between research productivity and teaching effectiveness: complementary, antagonistic, or independent constructs? Journal of Higher Education, 73(5), 603–641.

Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., Foy, P., & Hooper, M. (2016). TIMSS 2015 International Results in Science. Retrieved from http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2015/international-results/

Mägi, E., & Beerkens, M. (2016). Linking research and teaching: Are research active staff members different teachers? Higher Education, 72(2), 241–258. | DOI 10.1007/s10734-015-9951-1

Milne, I. (2010). A sense of wonder, arising from aesthetic experiences, should be the starting point for inquiry in primary science. Science Education International 21(2), 102–115.

Osborne J., Simon S., & Tytler R. (2009). Attitudes towards science. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, April 13-17, 2012, San Diego, California. Retrieved from http://science.teachingjournalclub.org/wp-content/

uploads/2012/06/Attitudes-Toward-Science-OsborneSimon-Tytler.pdf

Prince, M., Felder, R., & Brent, R. (2007). Does faculty research improve undergraduate teaching? An analysis of existing and potential synergies. Journal of engineering education, 96(4), 283–294. | DOI 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2007.tb00939.x

Ratcliffe, M., Bartholomew, H., Hames, V., Hind, A., Leach, J., Millar, R., & Osborne, J. (2005). Evidence-based practice in science education: the research-user interface. Research Papers in Education, 20(2), 169–186. | DOI 10.1080/02671520500078036

Robertson, J., & Bond, C. (2005). The research/teaching relation: A view from the 'edge'. Higher Education, 50(3), 509–535. | DOI 10.1007/s10734-004-6365-x

Rowley, J. (2002). Using case studies in research. Management Research News, 25(1), 16–27. | DOI 10.1108/01409170210782990

Ryan, R., & Deci, E. (2002). An overview of the self-determination theory: An organismicdialectical perspective. In E. Deci & R. Ryan (Eds.) Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 3-33). Rochester, NY: The University of Rochester Press.

Rukavina S., Zuvic-Butorac M., Ledic J., Milotic B., & Jurdana-Sepic, R. (2012) Developing positive attitude towards science and mathematics through motivational classroom experiences. Science Education International, 23(1), 6–19.

Schimank, U., & Winnes, M. (2000). Beyond Humboldt? The relationship between teaching and research in European university systems. Science and Public Policy, 27 (6), 397–408. | DOI 10.3152/147154300781781733

Schutjes, E. (in preparation). The effects of a language-oriented science course on the motivation and knowledge of primary school children.

Shrigley, R., & Kobala, T. (1989). Anecdotes: What research suggests about their use in the science classroom. School Science and Mathematics, 89(4), 293–298. | DOI 10.1111/j.1949-8594.1989.tb11924.x

Sjoberg, S., & Schreiner, C. (2010). The ROSE project: An overview and key findings. Oslo: University of Oslo.

Sokolowska, D., De Meyere, J., Folmer, E., Rovsek, B., & Peeters, W. (2014). Balancing the needs between training for future scientists and broader societal needs – SECURE project research on mathematics, science and technology curricula and their implementation. Science Education International, 25(1), 40–51.

Tuan, H.-L., Chin, C.-C., & Shieh, S.-H. (2005). The development of a questionnaire to measure students' motivation towards science learning. International Journal of Science Education, 27(6), 639–654. | DOI 10.1080/0950069042000323737

Vogel, M. (2009). The professionalism of professors at German Fachhochschulen. Studies in Higher Education, 34(8), 873–888. | DOI 10.1080/03075070902737870

Windschitl, M. (2003). Inquiry projects in science teacher education: what can investigative experiences reveal about teacher thinking and eventual classroom practice? Science Teacher Education, 87(1), 112–143.




 


Časopis Ústavu pedagogických věd FF MU.

Výkonná redakce: Klára Šeďová, Roman Švaříček, Zuzana Šalamounová, Martin Sedláček, Karla Brücknerová, Petr Hlaďo.

Redakční rada: Milan Pol (předseda redakční rady), Gunnar Berg, Inka Bormann, Michael Bottery, Elisa Calcagni, Hana Cervinkova, Eve Eisenschmidt, Ola Andres Erstad, Peter Gavora, Yin Cheong Cheng, Miloš Kučera, Adam Lefstein, Sami Lehesvuori, Jan Mareš, Jiří Mareš, Jiří Němec, Angelika Paseka, Jana Poláchová Vašťatková, Milada Rabušicová, Alina Reznitskaya, Michael Schratz, Martin Strouhal, Petr Svojanovský, António Teodoro, Tony Townsend, Anita Trnavčevič, Jan Vanhoof, Arnošt Veselý, Kateřina Vlčková, Eliška Walterová.

Časopis vydává čtyři čísla ročně.

ISSN 1803-7437 (print), ISSN 2336-4521 (online)