Nadaný žák je jako Jágr mezi hokejisty aneb Učitelova koncepce nadání v analýze metafor
Abstrakt
Klíčová slova
Celý článek:
PDFReference
Altintas, E., & Ilgun, S. (2016). The term "gifted child" from teachers' view. Educational Research and Reviews, 11(10), 957–965. | DOI 10.5897/ERR2016.2762
Armstrong, S. L., Davis, H. S., & Paulson, E. J. (2011). The subjectivity problem: Improving triangulation approaches in metaphor analysis studies. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 10(2), 151–163. | DOI 10.1177/160940691101000204
Bégin, J., & Gagné, F. (1994). Predictors of sttitudes toward gifted education: A review of the literature and blueprints for future research. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 17(2), 161–179. | DOI 10.1177/016235329401700206
Bohner, G., & Wänke, M. (2002). Attitudes and attitude change. East Sussex: Psychology Press.
Borland, J. H. (2005). Gifted education without gifted children. The case for no conception of giftedness. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (s. 1–19). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Callahan, C. M., & Herberg-Davis, H. L. (Eds.). (2013). Fundamentals of gifted education – Considering multiple perspectives. London: Routledge.
Copenhaver, R. W., & McIntyre, D. J. (1992). Teachers' perceptions of gifted students. Roeper Review, 14(3), 151–154. | DOI 10.1080/02783199209553411
Dai, D. Y. (2009). Essential tensions surrounding the concept of giftedness. In L. V. Shavinina, International handbook on giftedness (s. 39–80). Essex: Springer.
Davis, G. A., Rimm, S. B., & Siegle, D. (2011). Education of the gifted and talented. New Jersey: Pearson.
Drulák, P. (2006). Svět jako metafora. Mezinárodní vztahy, 41(4), 67–80.
Farrell, T. S. C. (2006). The teacher is an octopus. RELC Journal, 37(2), 236–248.
Gagné, F. (1983). Perceptions of programs for gifted children: Agreement on principles, but disagreement over modalities. B. C. Journal of Special Education, 7(2), 113–127.
Hříbková, L. (2005). Nadání a nadaní. Praha: Pedagogická fakulta UK.
Hunsaker, S. L. (Ed.). (2012). Identification: The theory and practice of identifying students for gifted and talented education services. Waco: Prufrock Press.
Inbar, D. E. (1996). The free educational prison: Metaphors and images. Educational Research, 38(1), 77–92. | DOI 10.1080/0013188960380106
Jensen, D. F. N. (2006). Metaphors as a bridge to understanding educational and social contexts. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 1–17.
Kalra, M. B., & Baveja, B. (2012). Teacher thinking about knowledge, learning and learners: A metaphor analysis. Procedia – Social Behavioras Sciences, 55, 314–326.
Krijan, I. P., & Borić, E. (2015). Teacher's attitudes towards gifted students and differences in attitudes regarding the years. Croatian Journal of Education / Hrvatski časopis za odgoj i obrazovanje, 17(1), 681–724.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors we live by. London: The University of Chicago Press.
Lassig, C. J. (2009). Teachers' attitudes towards the gifted: The importance of professional development and school culture. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 18(2), 32–42.
McCoach, D. B., & Siegle, D. (2007). What predics teachers' attitudes toward the gifted? The Gifted Child Quarterly, 51(3), 246–255. | DOI 10.1177/0016986207302719
Miller, E. M. (2009). The effect of training in gifted education on elementary classroom teachers' theory – Based reasoning about the concept of giftedness. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 33(1), 65–105. | DOI 10.1177/016235320903300104
Misset, T., & McCormic, K. (2014). Conceptions of giftedness. In J. A. Plucker & C. M. Callahan (Eds.), Critical issues and practices in gifted education (s. 143–157). Waco: Prufrock Press.
Mudrák, J. (2013). Postoje studentů učitelství k nadání. Svět nadání. Časopis o nadaných a nadání, 2(2), 45–52.
Nehyba, J., & Svojanovský, P. (2016). Tacitní znalosti v metaforách studentky učitelství. Studia paedagogica, 21(1), 57–85. | DOI 10.5817/SP2016-1-4
Olthouse, J. (2014). How do preservice teachers conceptualize giftedness? A metaphor analysis. Roeper Review, 36(2), 122–132. | DOI 10.1080/02783193.2014.884200
Porter, L. (1999). Gifted young children. A guide for teachers and parents. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Portešová, Š., Budíková, M., & Koutková, H. (2011). Crucial determinants affecting the attitude of Czech educators toward education of extraordinarily gifted learners. The New Educational Review, 24(2), 305–326.
Sankar-DeLeeuw, N. (2002). Gifted preschoolers: Parent and teacher views on identification, early admission, and programming. Roeper Review, 24(3), 172–177. | DOI 10.1080/02783190209554174
Smith, Ch. M. M. (2006). Principles of inclusion: Implications for able learners. In Ch. M. M. Smith (Ed.), Including the gifted and talented. Making inclusion work for more gifted and able learners (s. 3–21). London: Routledge.
Švaříček, R., & Čejková, I. (2016). Metaforický svět učení. In M. Strouhal & S. Štech (Eds.), Vzdělání a dnešek. Pedagogické, filosofické, historické a sociální perspektivy (s. 124–145). Praha: Karolinum.
Téllez, K. (2016). The teaching instinct. Explorations into what makes us human. New York: Routledge.
Vialle, W. (1994). 'Termanal' science? The work of Lewis Terman revisited. Roeper Review, 17(1), 32–38. | DOI 10.1080/02783199409553614
Zheng, H., & Song, W. (2010). Metaphor analysis in the educational discourse: A critical review. US-China Foreign Language, 8(9), 42–44.
 | O časopisu |
 | Redakce |
 | Aktuální číslo |
 | Všechna čísla |
 | Virtuální monočísla |
 | Nejčtenější články |
 | Pro autory |
 | Publikační etika |
 | Výzva pro autory |
 | Vyhledávání |
