Youth. Revisiting policy dilemmas in internet safety in the context of children's rights

Investor logo

Warning

This publication doesn't include Faculty of Arts. It includes Faculty of Social Studies. Official publication website can be found on muni.cz.
Authors

BARBOVSCHI Monica O'NEILL Brian MARINESCU Valentina STAKSRUD Elisabeth MCLAUGHLIN Sarah

Year of publication 2013
Type Chapter of a book
MU Faculty or unit

Faculty of Social Studies

Citation
Description Among the different myths that circulate within policy discussions of internet safety, two are especially prevalent. The myth of innocence (Meyer, 2007) which promotes the image of the child-as-victim in need of adult supervision and regulation (Jenks, 1996; Livingstone, 2002), and its counterpart, the myth of the competent cyber-kid, both fail to capture the nuances of the various situations and roles children might find themselves in when using the internet. The first approach positions the child only in the role as passive recipient of content, without taking into consideration numerous situations where children play an active role or may even initiate problematic conduct online (e.g. cyber-bullying). The latter does not take into account children’s incomplete social development and inability to assess complex social situations (including those online). The present chapter deals with the cleavage between the two approaches, namely the protectionist versus the participation approach, as articulated through various European policy documents and pits them against the data collected by the EU Kids Online II project (2009-2011) about children’s use of the internet and risks encountered online
Related projects:

You are running an old browser version. We recommend updating your browser to its latest version.