Watch Out for the Universal Quantifier

Authors

STRACHOŇOVÁ Hana

Year of publication 2014
Type Article in Proceedings
Conference Complex Visibles Out There. Proceedings of the Olomouc Linguistics Colloquium 2014: Language Use and Linguistic Structure.
MU Faculty or unit

Faculty of Arts

Citation
Web http://olinco.upol.cz/assets/olinco-2014-proceedings.pdf
Field Linguistics
Keywords negation; Slavic; free choice items; competition in grammar
Description We build on the assumption of Pereltsvaig 2006 that Slavic FCIs don't occur in the scope of the sentential negation (although according to Kadmon and Landman 1993 the negation as DE operator should license them) because of the morphological blocking by negative indefinites (n-words). This explanation works in cases where both propositions (the one with an FCI and the other with an n-word) have the same meaning. That is not the case of (5) and (6); see the formalization in (7) for sentence in (5) and in (8) for sentence in (6). We extend the approach of Aloni 2007b and argue that the universal quantifier over alternatives introduced by the possibility modal context is responsible for the different truth conditional meaning of (5) and (6), which explains the fact that both FCI and n-words are acceptable in the same syntactic environment (in contrast to the sentential negation only).
Related projects:

You are running an old browser version. We recommend updating your browser to its latest version.