Explaining Bobaljik’s Root Suppletion Generalization as an Instance of the Adjacency Condition (and Beyond)

Authors

CAHA Pavel

Year of publication 2017
Type Article in Proceedings
Conference Language Use and Linguistic Structure. Proceedings of the Olomouc Linguistics Colloquium 2016
MU Faculty or unit

Faculty of Arts

Citation
Web http://olinco.upol.cz/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/olinco-2016-proceedings.pdf
Field Linguistics
Keywords suppletion; comparatives; RSG; adjacency; words
Description Bobaljik (2012) observes on the basis of an impressive sample of languages that root suppletion is hardly ever conditioned by degree markers that do not form a word with the root. He calls this the Root Suppletion Generalization (RSG). If true, the generalization provides a possible argument for the lexicalist position: RSG can be seen as a consequence of the lexicalist architecture, where words are built pre-syntax, and therefore syntax cannot influence their shape (Williams 2007). Against this background, this paper discusses evidence (some of it presented already in Bobaljik’s work) that the RSG (when stated over words) is empirically (sometimes) too weak and (sometimes also) too strong. In view of these observations, I suggest a way in which all of these examples can be captured in ways that do not lend any support to lexicalism, simply because the word is not the relevant notion for blocking suppletion.
Related projects: