Fact-checking jako přesvědčovací dialog
| Title in English | Fact-checking as a persuasive dialogue |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Year of publication | 2024 |
| Type | Article in Periodical |
| Magazine / Source | Studia philosophica |
| MU Faculty or unit | |
| Citation | |
| web | https://digilib.phil.muni.cz/handle/11222.digilib/digilib.81189 |
| Doi | http://dx.doi.org/10.5817/sPh2024-2-3 |
| Keywords | epistemology; fact-checking; fact information; disinformation; objectivity; persuasion dialogue |
| Description | The aim of my paper is to provide a critique of fact-checking and to suggest modifications to the methodology to increase its epistemic relevance. First, I will present the current model of fact-checking as a branch of applied epistemology, its methodology and goals. Next, I will define and evaluate the epistemic characteristics of the fact-checking process modeled as a type of persuasive dialogue. To what extent should institutionalized fact-checking influence public trust in the claims being evaluated? What are the epistemological characteristics of the evaluation criteria of fact-checking? When are fact-checking criteria objective? |
| Related projects: |