Internet gaming disorder scale : A comparison of symptoms prevalence, structure, and invariance in 12 nationally representative European adolescent samples

Investor logo

Warning

This publication doesn't include Faculty of Arts. It includes Faculty of Social Studies. Official publication website can be found on muni.cz.
Authors

STAŠEK Andrea GALEOTTI Tommaso CANALE Natale VAN DEN EIJNDEN Regina HUSAROVÁ Daniela BLINKA Lukas

Year of publication 2025
Type Article in Periodical
Magazine / Source Journal of Behavioral Addictions
MU Faculty or unit

Faculty of Social Studies

Citation
web
Doi https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.2025.00090
Keywords Internet Gaming Disorder; prevalence; psychometrics; network analysis; measurement invariance; HBSC
Attached files
Description Background Internet Gaming Disorder (IGD) is recognized as a significant health issue in adolescents. However, the cross-national comparison and validation remain underrepresented in the literature. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the symptom prevalence, dimensionality, and measurement invariance of the nine-item Internet Gaming Disorder Scale (IGDS) with data from the 2021–22 Health Behaviour in School-aged Children survey. Methods Representative samples of adolescents aged 11–15 from 12 European regions (N = 44,126) were used. The IGDS was examined using network analyses and factor models with dynamic cut-offs. Results Gaming intensity was more related to IGDS score than gaming frequency. Non-gaming boys at the time of measurement reported similar IGDS scores as daily gamers. All symptoms were more common in boys; Escapism and Preoccupation were the most common symptoms overall. A unidimensional structure for the IGDS across both genders and all regions was indicated. Only configural invariance was observed across genders, with notable higher roles for “Problems” and “Preoccupation” in boys, suggesting problematic direct gender comparisons. Measurement invariance suggested three relatively homogenous region groups, showing varying levels of invariance, and some groups achieving scalar invariance. Consequently, cross-regional comparisons should be approached with caution. Conclusions The findings suggest large differences between boys and girls, moderate differences between age groups, and relatively high differences among regions.
Related projects:

You are running an old browser version. We recommend updating your browser to its latest version.