Miller's and Taliga's Fallacies about Verisimilitude Counting

Investor logo
Authors

RACLAVSKÝ Jiří

Year of publication 2008
Type Article in Periodical
Magazine / Source Organon F
MU Faculty or unit

Faculty of Arts

Citation
Field Philosophy and religion
Keywords verisimilitude; translation invariance; conceptual systems; constructions; transparent intensional logic
Description The present paper is a reaction to David Miller's and Milos Taliga's defence of so called linguistic dependence of verisimilitude counting of Pavel Tichý's approach. I show mainly that their construal of identity of scientific theories is fallacious thus it cannot support an argument against Tichý's conception.
Related projects:

You are running an old browser version. We recommend updating your browser to its latest version.

By clicking “Accept Cookies”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. Cookie Settings

Necessary Only Accept Cookies